In
Glaspell’s A Jury of Her Peers, Mrs.
Peters is one of two jurors on the case of a woman being accused of murdering
her husband. She’s a soft-spoken, polite woman who doesn’t want to be on the
case, but must. On top of this, her husband is the sheriff who appears as a
prime example of what a sheriff should be. The past-stereotype of “strong
husband, oppressed, quiet wife” is very present throughout the story,
relevantly with regard to both Mrs.Peters and the woman she’s juror of. Mrs. Peters’ character arc is heavily
influenced by her having lived this way for some time.
On
one side, Mrs. Peters desires to remain her quiet self and not stray from her
current public image. It’s the easiest thing and doesn’t provoke any sort of
conflict or negative views from the majority of others. On the other side is
what Mrs. Peters wants, and what she goes after. She finds out that the woman
accused of killing her husband did in fact do it, but tries to prove her
innocent. Mrs. Peters does this rather than telling the truth because the woman
had been abused and controlled by her husband for a long time. She can relate
and feels the murder was justified, so she pursues satisfaction towards her
individuality, and deals with the negatives that occur as a result.
Mrs.
Peters proves that she’s strong-willed by taking the difficult path. She
fights, lies, and struggles for her fellow oppressed women. While the case is
based on one woman, Mrs. Peters actions are for all of them.
I would do the same because I love all of my friends. I would lie for them if it was going to save their life. Women in society today do not get the same opportunities as others. Women and minorities have it the hardest so we are constantly fighting a battle within ourselves if we should speak out on the mistreatment or should we just accept it. I myself would speak out I am a very outspoken person and will not let anything stop me.
ReplyDelete