To be honest, I didn’t think I would like this book,
“Packing for Mars”, because of its
cover. I know how cliché that sounds, “Never
judge a book by its cover” but the first chapter was intriguing enough to reel
me in. I loved reading about the different
tests that the competing people were put through. The origami test, for instance, seemed
strange to me but actually does make sense.
One of the quotes I found interesting was, “Its forensic origami: As the
deadline nears and the pressure increases, do the candidate’s creases become
sloppy? How do the first ten cranes compare to the last? “Deterioration of
accuracy shows impatience under stress” (26).
This was interesting to me because when people think of astronauts, they
think of diligent, quick-thinking, intelligent people. It’s such a clever way
to test a person’s patience, work ethic, and concentration, what better way to
root out those who don’t fit the profile?
Another thing that surprised me was the way some astronauts viewed their
time in space. Gene Cernan, Apollo 17
astronaut, was noted as writing, “Funny thing happened on the way to the moon:
not much. Should have brought some
crossword puzzles” (27). I feel like no
matter how many times I went to space, I would be focused on the view. Mary Roach begins to explain how many veteran
astronauts became a bit bored in space, which could be understanding. However I view myself as the Harland Williams
type in the movie “Rocket man”, I’d
make the best of it. Astronaut Norm
Thagard had said, “Life on Mir was mostly mundane” (27). Supposedly putting up with boredom is in an
astronaut’s training manual to make the cut.
That being said, I like all the psychology behind an astronauts
training. This chapter revolves around
analyzing an astronaut’s psyche, I feel.
It was funny how lunch time played out, when Applicant A initiates the
start of the meal, but didn’t begin eating right away himself as he knew they
were all being scrutinized. Even the way
their etiquette and plates were before, during, and after the meal were
observed which seemed like a curious thing to test them on. How about when the applicants were told to
build themselves and everyone else with Legos?
The Lego representation of yourself could have bright, flashy colors,
while the others are all dull and look drab.
This could mean the applicant could be arrogant, selfish, not a team
player, etc. and it’s interesting that children’s toys can be utilized by
adults to test the mind. Basically, the
thing with this chapter that I found to be most alluring was the many ways a
person’s personality/mind is examined completely to judge who will be the next
spaceman.
It was definitely interesting to learn about all of the different tests that astronauts have to go through before they can pass the test and go into space. I can understand what the what the paper crane test might tell them but some of the other tests still seemed a little strange to me. It's amazing to think about how much psychologists can determine from seemingly meaningless things. I can understand how important it is though. Space travel is not for someone with a short temper or who doesn't have their heart in the journey.
ReplyDeleteit was really in Fascinating know all of the many different tests these people have to go through in order to be qualified for their journey to space. all those tests were unfamiliar to me. I found it difficult understanding the explanations of some of those test. I guest it would be the same if I was to explain medical tests to an astronaut.
ReplyDeleteBoredom! I think it would be an amazing thing to go to space however, there is only so much you can do in a tin can. I don't think that I would have been able to pass that portion of the test. Patience is not my strong suit.
ReplyDelete